Summary: | dev-libs/criterion: keywording | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Sam James <sam> |
Component: | Keywording | Assignee: | Tomáš Mózes <hydrapolic> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | proxy-maint |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES |
Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check+
|
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
>=dev-libs/boxfort-0.0.1_pre20200110 ~arm ~arm64 ~x86
>=dev-libs/criterion-2.4_pre20200110 ~arm ~arm64 ~x86
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
Bug Depends on: | 732812 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Sam James
2020-06-27 02:29:41 UTC
Sanity check failed:
> dev-libs/criterion-2.4_pre20200110
> depend ~arm stable profile default/linux/arm/17.0 (1 total)
> dev-libs/boxfort
> depend ~arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/armv4 (31 total)
> dev-libs/boxfort
Boxfort is needed too. No problem, feel free to add it, but I don't run anything except amd64 so cannot even test if it works elsewhere. All sanity-check issues have been resolved (In reply to Tomáš Mózes from comment #2) > Boxfort is needed too. > > No problem, feel free to add it, but I don't run anything except amd64 so > cannot even test if it works elsewhere. Sure. No problem: we'll do arm(64) for now. (In reply to Sam James (sec padawan) from comment #4) > (In reply to Tomáš Mózes from comment #2) > > Boxfort is needed too. > > > > No problem, feel free to add it, but I don't run anything except amd64 so > > cannot even test if it works elsewhere. > > Sure. No problem: we'll do arm(64) for now. Ok thanks I think it would be pretty safe to also consider x86. dev-libs/boxfort is OK, but dev-libs/criterion tests fail exactly as per #732812. Tested inside a VM with stage3-i686-20210308T214503Z.tar.xz and sys-kernel/gentoo-kernel-bin-5.4.97 amd64 (I don't think it makes much of a difference). I can give you build and test logs if you need them, although there really is nothing new to see. (In reply to Shiba from comment #6) > I think it would be pretty safe to also consider x86. dev-libs/boxfort is > OK, but dev-libs/criterion tests fail exactly as per #732812. Tested inside > a VM with stage3-i686-20210308T214503Z.tar.xz and > sys-kernel/gentoo-kernel-bin-5.4.97 amd64 (I don't think it makes much of a > difference). I can give you build and test logs if you need them, although > there really is nothing new to see. Sure. arm64 done arm done The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=703e5172b7fa018b7124757c710343032de38f47 commit 703e5172b7fa018b7124757c710343032de38f47 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-03-22 23:07:12 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-03-22 23:07:16 +0000 dev-libs/boxfort: keyword 0.0.1_pre20200902: ~arm, ~arm64 We had fixed atoms/versions in the bug so we missed the newer version. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/729802 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> dev-libs/boxfort/boxfort-0.0.1_pre20200902.ebuild | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) x86 keyworded, closing |