| Summary: | dev-lua/luacheck: dropped keywords | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Sam James <sam> |
| Component: | Keywording | Assignee: | Victor Payno <vpayno+gentoo> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | gyakovlev, ppc, x86 |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES |
| Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check-
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: |
dev-lua/luacheck-0.23.0 ~x86 ~arm ~ppc
dev-lua/lua-argparse-0.6.0-r1 ~arm ~ppc ~x86
dev-lua/lua-utf8-0.1.1 ~arm ~ppc ~x86
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
| Bug Depends on: | 723156 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Sam James
2020-06-27 00:10:39 UTC
Sanity check failed:
> dev-lua/luacheck-0.23.0
> bdepend ~arm stable profile default/linux/arm/17.0 (22 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> bdepend ~arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/armv4 (31 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> depend ~arm stable profile default/linux/arm/17.0 (22 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> depend ~arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/armv4 (31 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> rdepend ~arm stable profile default/linux/arm/17.0 (22 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> rdepend ~arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/armv4 (31 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
Should these deps have a ? to make the USE conditional, given luajit is optional itself for this package? RDEPEND=" dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit=] dev-lua/luafilesystem[luajit(-)=] dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit=] !luajit? ( >=dev-lang/lua-5.1:= ) luajit? ( dev-lang/luajit:2 )" (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > Should these deps have a ? to make the USE conditional, given luajit is > optional itself for this package? > > RDEPEND=" > dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit=] > dev-lua/luafilesystem[luajit(-)=] > dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit=] > !luajit? ( >=dev-lang/lua-5.1:= ) > luajit? ( dev-lang/luajit:2 )" ping (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > Should these deps have a ? to make the USE conditional, given luajit is > optional itself for this package? Nevermind! Sanity check failed:
> dev-lua/luacheck-0.23.0
> bdepend ~arm stable profile default/linux/arm/17.0 (22 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> bdepend ~arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/armv4 (31 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> depend ~arm stable profile default/linux/arm/17.0 (22 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> depend ~arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/armv4 (31 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> rdepend ~arm stable profile default/linux/arm/17.0 (22 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> rdepend ~arm dev profile default/linux/arm/17.0/armv4 (31 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
Sanity check failed:
> dev-lua/luacheck-0.23.0
> bdepend ~ppc stable profile default/linux/powerpc/ppc32/17.0 (21 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> depend ~ppc stable profile default/linux/powerpc/ppc32/17.0 (21 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> rdepend ~ppc stable profile default/linux/powerpc/ppc32/17.0 (21 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
Sanity check failed:
> dev-lua/luacheck-0.23.0
> bdepend ~x86 stable profile default/linux/x86/17.0 (11 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> depend ~x86 stable profile default/linux/x86/17.0 (11 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
> rdepend ~x86 stable profile default/linux/x86/17.0 (11 total)
> dev-lua/lua-argparse[luajit]
> dev-lua/lua-utf8[luajit]
arm done Unable to check for sanity:
> no match for package: dev-lua/lua-utf8-0.1.1
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=46f4a77e32acc68fd335083575ce2124024afc27 commit 46f4a77e32acc68fd335083575ce2124024afc27 Author: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-11-29 01:27:18 +0000 Commit: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-11-29 01:32:25 +0000 dev-lua/luacheck: add keywords and update deps Also fixed tests. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/729794 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/723156 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org> dev-lua/luacheck/luacheck-0.23.0-r1.ebuild | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) Additionally, it has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=69923c94494f0ec7a864262a8b81150b3b5329be commit 69923c94494f0ec7a864262a8b81150b3b5329be Author: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-11-29 01:23:36 +0000 Commit: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-11-29 01:32:24 +0000 dev-lua/lua-argparse: add missing keywords Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/729794 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org> dev-lua/lua-argparse/lua-argparse-0.6.0-r1.ebuild | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ca240a16a012b7d4c547024841f1f48211e96f1f commit ca240a16a012b7d4c547024841f1f48211e96f1f Author: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-11-29 00:55:11 +0000 Commit: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-11-29 01:32:23 +0000 dev-lua/luacheck: migrate to lua eclass Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/723156 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/729794 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.2 Signed-off-by: Conrad Kostecki <conikost@gentoo.org> ...0.23.0-disable-measuring-performance-test.patch | 13 +++++ dev-lua/luacheck/luacheck-0.23.0-r100.ebuild | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++ profiles/package.mask | 1 + 3 files changed, 79 insertions(+) |