| Summary: | dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5: missing patch | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michael Mair-Keimberger (iamnr3) <mmk> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | William Hubbs <williamh> |
| Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | robbat2 |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Hi, It seems that dev-lang/lua misses a patch in the files directory: * lua-5.1.5.tar.gz BLAKE2B SHA512 size ;-) ... [ ok ] >>> Unpacking source... >>> Unpacking lua-5.1.5.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5/work >>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5/work >>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5/work/lua-5.1.5 ... * Applying lua-5.1.5-gentoo-build.patch ... [ ok ] * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is: * * /var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5/files/lua-5.1.5-disable-readline.patch * ( lua-5.1.5-disable-readline.patch ) * ERROR: dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5::gentoo failed (prepare phase): * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE! * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 125: Called src_prepare * environment, line 3111: Called epatch '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5/files/lua-5.1.5-disable-readline.patch' * environment, line 818: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * die "Cannot find \$EPATCH_SOURCE!"; * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5::gentoo'`, * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv '=dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5::gentoo'`. * The complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5/temp/build.log'. * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5/temp/environment'. * Working directory: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5/work/lua-5.1.5' * S: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-lang/lua-5.1.5-r5/work/lua-5.1.5 I think the ebuild uses the wrong file for patching. r5 came with 719f9a18c8709bf355d7ea80c09cd4e87f0a11fe which also brought us lua-5.1.5-readline.patch which is actually unused. So i guess instead of calling epatch lua-5.1.5-disable-readline.patch it would be correct to call epatch lua-5.1.5-readline.patch ?