Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 726670

Summary: app-misc/sl does not respect CFLAGS/LDFLAGS
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: Agostino Sarubbo <ago>
Component: Current packagesAssignee: Patrice Clement <monsieurp>
Severity: normal CC: esigra
Priority: Normal    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 59506, 331933    
Attachments: build.log

Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-06-01 15:52:07 UTC
This is an auto-filed bug because app-misc/sl does not respect CFLAGS/LDFLAGS.
The issue was originally discovered on amd64, but it may be reproducible on other arches as well.
If you think that a different summary clarifies the issue better, feel free to change it.
Attached build log and emerge --info.

To reproduce this issue you may want to add "-frecord-gcc-switches" to CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS/FFLAGS/FCFLAGS and LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0". If this is not something about c/c++ see this bug as an hint to hide the QA warning (with QA_FLAGS_IGNORED) where is not possible to respect CFLAGS/LDFLAGS.
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-06-01 15:52:12 UTC
Created attachment 643058 [details]

build log and emerge --info
Comment 2 Patrice Clement gentoo-dev 2020-06-04 06:58:27 UTC
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2020-06-04 10:55:36 UTC
I still can reproduce the ldflags issue
Comment 4 Larry the Git Cow gentoo-dev 2020-06-04 15:36:45 UTC
The bug has been closed via the following commit(s):

commit cd74ec7b947eb456f238e45ca13c9918bf31515a
Author:     Patrice Clement <>
AuthorDate: 2020-06-04 12:31:17 +0000
Commit:     Patrice Clement <>
CommitDate: 2020-06-04 15:36:37 +0000

    app-misc/sl: honor LDFLAGS.
    Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.22
    Signed-off-by: Patrice Clement <>

 app-misc/sl/sl-5.02.ebuild | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Comment 5 Patrice Clement gentoo-dev 2020-10-30 20:51:30 UTC
*** Bug 729404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***