Bug 72461 – www-apps/viewcvs: tar export abuse (CAN-2004-0915)

• Product: Gentoo Security
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-11-25 06:27:21 UTC]

From vendor-sec, to be kept confidential :

---------------------------
Hajvan Sehic discovered several vulnerabilities in viewcvs, a utility
for viewing CVS and Subversion repositories via HTTP.  In both cases
the program doesn't honour the settings enough to hide certain
directories from the tar export.

Problem 1: hide_cvsroot doesn't work when a tar file is exported

Problem 2: forbidden is ignored when a tar file is exported

The attached patches patches for both version 0.9 and 1.0 which have
different code but are both vulnerable to these problems seem to fix
those.  Upstream is unresponsive unfortunately.

This is most probably not that critical since many CVS repositories
are available via anonymous CVS anyway and that one does support
neither of these options.
---------------------------------------------

[Comment 1 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-11-25 06:28:29 UTC]

Created attachment 44712 [details, diff]
patch.CAN-2004-0915.viewcvs.0.9.2

Patch for 0.9.x viewcvs

[Comment 2 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2004-11-25 13:42:14 UTC]

Renat this is a restricted bug, please prepare a fixed ebuild and have it ready when a disclosure date is agreed with vendor-sec.

[Comment 3 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-12-02 09:09:52 UTC]

Ccing Stuart as rl03 seems inactive

[Comment 4 Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) 2004-12-02 12:27:48 UTC]

Can we commit this patch into portage, or do we have to wait until vendor-sec declassify the bug?

Thanks,
Stu

[Comment 5 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-12-03 00:49:01 UTC]

We still have to wait before pushing any of this in a public repository.

You can attach the ebuild (or a tarball with the ebuild and files) to this bug, so that we can push them for early stable testing to selected devs.

[Comment 6 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2004-12-06 04:23:41 UTC]

This is public now. 

Stuart please commit the patch.

[Comment 7 Stuart Herbert (RETIRED) 2004-12-07 07:02:22 UTC]

viewcvs-0.9.2_p20041207.ebuild has been added, and marked stable on x86.  Needs marking stable on ppc.

Please note: I've done minimal testing on this package.

Best regards,
Stu

[Comment 8 Luke Macken (RETIRED) 2004-12-07 07:06:02 UTC]

ppc, please mark viewcvs-0.9.2_p20041207 stable.

[Comment 9 Jochen Maes (RETIRED) 2004-12-08 00:24:31 UTC]

stable on ppc

[Comment 10 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen (RETIRED) 2004-12-08 00:44:19 UTC]

Security please vote on GLSA on this one.

[Comment 11 Matthias Geerdsen (RETIRED) 2004-12-08 01:06:30 UTC]

I would vote for a GLSA

Debian published a DSA already btw.

[Comment 12 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-12-08 04:47:37 UTC]

Yes, GLSA needed.

[Comment 13 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-12-20 06:11:22 UTC]

I'll handle this together with bug 73772

[Comment 14 Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2004-12-28 06:30:29 UTC]

GLSA 200412-26