Summary: | mkfs.reiser4 segfaults | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Dan Egli <dan> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Gentoo's Team for Core System packages <base-system> |
Status: | RESOLVED UPSTREAM | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Dan Egli
2004-11-24 13:06:11 UTC
not our problem (we dont support reiser4) e-mail the upstream dev list and/or file a bug WHO is this upstream people? If I download mkreiser4 from the reiserfs home page and compile it, no problem. So it's not a bug in mkreiser4. It's a bug in one of the patches applied to mkreiser4. If you don't support reiser4, why is the reiser4 tools in portage? i assume you mean you downloaded libaal and reiser4progs i dont know what 'patches' you're refering to, our ebuilds dont apply any if no patches are applied, why can I d/l the same things from namesys, compile using the default options, and have it work flawlessly (except for the kernel not recognising reiser4, which I found out AFTER I filed the bug in the first place) Here's what the ebuild does: * econf: updating /var/tmp/portage/reiser4progs-1.0.2/work/reiser4progs-1.0.2/config.guess with /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.guess * econf: updating /var/tmp/portage/reiser4progs-1.0.2/work/reiser4progs-1.0.2/config.sub with /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.sub ./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/lib --disable-full-static --disable-mkfs-static --disable-fsck-static --disable-debugfs-static --disable-measurefs-static --disable-cpfs-static --disable-resizefs-static --disable-debug --with-readline --enable-libminimal --sbindir=/sbin --libdir=/lib My difference when compiling manually was to skip the first 2 steps, and ran configure as: ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc so maybe the bug is somewhere in there? the econf: updating messages are 100% harmless (and arent patches :P) as for the extra configure options, those were applied based upon your USE flags ... again, nothing relating to patching i'd suggest you try passing diff flags to ./configure and see what's cause the segfault ... either way, no combination of ./configure flags should trigger a segfault -> UPSTREAM problem |