| Summary: | dev-lisp/ecls-21.2.1-r4 does not respect LDFLAGS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Agostino Sarubbo <ago> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Common Lisp Bugs <common-lisp> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | esigra |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | UPSTREAM |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: | https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/merge_requests/261 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 331933 | ||
| Attachments: | build.log | ||
Created attachment 639148 [details]
build.log
build log and emerge --info
tinderbox has reproduced this issue with version 21.2.1-r3 - Updating summary. ci has reproduced this issue with version 21.2.1-r4 - Updating summary. The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=ceda3639f6211bfec7170eeb32b3c716b6937a82 commit ceda3639f6211bfec7170eeb32b3c716b6937a82 Author: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-11-05 11:30:27 +0000 Commit: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-11-05 11:30:47 +0000 dev-lisp/ecls: Respect LDFLAGS Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/723162 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.28, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Ulrich Müller <ulm@gentoo.org> dev-lisp/ecls/ecls-21.2.1-r4.ebuild | 1 + dev-lisp/ecls/files/ecls-21.2.1-ldflags.patch | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) Reported upstream: https://gitlab.com/embeddable-common-lisp/ecl/-/merge_requests/261 |
This is an auto-filled bug because dev-lisp/ecls does not respect LDFLAGS. The issue was originally discovered on amd64, but it may be reproducible on other arches as well. If you think that a different summary clarifies the issue better, feel free to change it. Attached build log and emerge --info. NOTE: To reproduce this issue you may want to set LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--defsym=__gentoo_check_ldflags__=0". If this is not something about c/c++ context you may want to see this bug as an hint to hide the QA warning where is not possible to respect LDFLAGS.