| Summary: | app-portage/genlop-0.30.3 - version bump | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Tom Kirchner <gentoobugzilla> |
| Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Portage Tools Team <tools-portage> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | bg, brianpankey, danmitchell, m.debruijne, xero |
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| URL: | http://pollycoke.org/genlop.html | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: |
ebuild diff from 0.30.2 to 0.30.3
fixed - ebuild diff from 0.30.2 to 0.30.3 |
||
|
Description
Tom Kirchner
2004-11-22 15:28:35 UTC
Created attachment 44518 [details, diff]
ebuild diff from 0.30.2 to 0.30.3
Tested and working on x86.
Thomas, for future reference, when bumping an ebuild, unless there is a good reason, you should not remove archs from KEYWORDS; all that is required is to change any archs that are stable to unstable (~arch). Created attachment 44561 [details, diff]
fixed - ebuild diff from 0.30.2 to 0.30.3
Geh - sorry about that. I won't do it again.
This 0.30.3 ebuild works fine for me. I think it's important this gets comitted to portage soon, since there's a glaring bug with time prediction of emerging packages in 0.30.2, and genlop was just featured in a gentoo newsletter. I did not test this ebuild with the changes mentioned in bug #70322, but it looks like those changes there should be incorporated into the new ebuild for 0.30.3 as well. I'm not sure what bash-completion is though, so I won't say anything more. whats the hold up with this? genlop hasn't been updated in so long, and this update was really needed. that stupid bug with --current is finally fixed. it's a month later and this still hasn't been updated, what's going on? *bump* hello? its been like 4 months after this was reported... someone gonna update portage? mmmmmm....i wonder if we post a pin number here for a credit card if anyone would notice... *EVIL LAFF* :P probably not....heh this bug and another irrelevant bug (46357) i've been monitoring since about the same time and both seem completely dead like this....helllooo ? any devs home? well, if any devs were awake, this bug would have been closed months ago...huh...so, the answer to your question is "probably not" in CVS |
