Summary: | dev-java/openjdk:11 circular dependency | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Samuel Bernardo <samuelbernardo.mail> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | jstein |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Samuel Bernardo
2020-05-04 23:47:44 UTC
Please attach the logs. Do not use external websites like pastebins, whenever possible. External websites are not permanent, information will be lost and links may direct to spam or malware instead of the needed information. Some developers maintain several hundred ebuilds and have to use tools to work with the attachments efficiently. Jonas Stein, I have no logs in this case because it fails due to circular dependency reference. So it fails when trying to fulfill the dependencies in gentoo tree. What I can left here is only the following: # emerge -v openjdk:11 [nomerge ] dev-java/openjdk-11.0.7_p10:11::gentoo USE="alsa cups javafx jbootstrap pch -debug -doc -examples (-gentoo-vm) -headless-awt (-nsplugin) (-selinux) -source -systemtap (-webstart)" [ebuild N ~] dev-java/openjfx-11.0.7_p1:11::gentoo USE="media -debug -doc -source" CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse2" 143,039 KiB [ebuild N ~] dev-java/openjdk-11.0.7_p10:11::gentoo USE="alsa cups javafx jbootstrap pch -debug -doc -examples (-gentoo-vm) -headless-awt (-nsplugin) (-selinux) -source -systemtap (-webstart)" 89,177 KiB Total: 2 packages (2 new), Size of downloads: 232,216 KiB * Error: circular dependencies: (dev-java/openjdk-11.0.7_p10:11/11::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) depends on (dev-java/openjdk-11.0.7_p10:11/11::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime) * Note that circular dependencies can often be avoided by temporarily * disabling USE flags that trigger optional dependencies. For the possible solution I already left my suggestion in first comment. Could the problem here be autounmask? (In reply to Nuno Silva from comment #3) > Could the problem here be autounmask? Thanks Nuno. Yes, it is. But also javafx flag. |