Bug 71853

Summary:	rsync://147.32.127.222/gentoo-portage is horribly slow
Product:	Mirrors	Reporter:	subtleandprofound
Component:	Server Problem	Assignee:	Mirror Admins <mirror-admin>
Status:	RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Severity:	minor	CC:	james
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	rsync://147.32.127.222/gentoo-portage
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description subtleandprofound 2004-11-20 09:28:19 UTC

I rsync'ed with rsync://147.32.127.222/gentoo-portage and it's horribly slow. Someone may want to take a look at it.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

Actual Results:  
>>> starting rsync with rsync://147.32.127.222/gentoo-portage...
>>> checking server timestamp ...

Welcome to SiLiCONN HiLL MiRROR SiTE
Use: ftp.sh.cvut.cz::ftp/

Server name: ftp.sh.cvut.cz
Server IP: 147.32.127.222
CPU and RAM: Intel Celeron 800MHz, 384MB
Connection: 100 MBit
Location: Europe, Czech Republic, Prague
Contact: admin@ftp.sh.cvut.cz

receiving file list ...
1 file to consider
timestamp.chk
          32 100%    0.00kB/s    0:00:00

Number of files: 1
Number of files transferred: 1
Total file size: 32 bytes
Total transferred file size: 32 bytes
Literal data: 32 bytes
Matched data: 0 bytes
File list size: 32
Total bytes written: 223
Total bytes read: 391

wrote 223 bytes  read 391 bytes  409.33 bytes/sec
total size is 32  speedup is 0.05

Welcome to SiLiCONN HiLL MiRROR SiTE
Use: ftp.sh.cvut.cz::ftp/

Server name: ftp.sh.cvut.cz
Server IP: 147.32.127.222
CPU and RAM: Intel Celeron 800MHz, 384MB
Connection: 100 MBit
Location: Europe, Czech Republic, Prague
Contact: admin@ftp.sh.cvut.cz

receiving file list ...
 3700 files...


Expected Results:  
It should've rsync'ed at least 10 times faster

Workaround:
# emerge sync
again so it finds another server which is faster. Just once is often enough.

Comment 1 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-12-10 18:29:18 UTC

James,

Any idea on the slowness?

-jeffrey

Comment 2 Jeffrey Forman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2005-01-19 06:14:52 UTC

Looked fine to me, I was pulling about 150KB/sec off the ftp. Reopen if the problem persists 

-Jeffrey