Summary: | windowmaker xfree ebuild dependancy | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | s252 <jerome> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Gnustep project <gnustep> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | jerome, lcars, pez, stharward |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | fixed xfree dependancy |
Description
s252
2004-11-18 15:26:08 UTC
Created attachment 44250 [details]
fixed xfree dependancy
Does this actually work for you? Meaning, does this compile and run for you? There were reports of freetype incompatibilities. *** Bug 71726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** checking for the Xft2 library... found checking whether libXft is at least version 2.1.2... no ERROR!!! libXft on this system is an old version. Please consider upgrading to at least version 2.1.2. # locate libXft /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1.1 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.1 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.so.2.1 /usr/X11R6/lib/libXft.a with xfree-4.3.0-r7 I changed configure to accept libXft-2.1.0 just to test, but the compile fails with: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../src -I/usr/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -march=i686 -O3 -pipe -O0 -c x86_specific.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/x86_specific.o x86_specific.c: In function `x86_mmx_TrueColor_32_to_16': x86_specific.c:323: more than 10 operands in `asm' x86_specific.c: In function `x86_mmx_TrueColor_24_to_16': x86_specific.c:459: more than 10 operands in `asm' x86_specific.c: In function `x86_PseudoColor_32_to_8': x86_specific.c:754: more than 10 operands in `asm' make[1]: *** [x86_specific.lo] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/portage/tmp/portage/windowmaker-0.91.0-r1/work/WindowMaker-0.91.0/wrlib' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Looks like its incompatable with gcc-2.95. Has anyone had success with the new windowmaker series on Xfree? Heh, that's why I didn't add "virtual/x11", but it if works, I would like to know. I'll close this bug tomorrow otherwise. No new ideas from anyone; closing bug as "wontfix". |