Summary: | sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0 fails several tests on ppc64 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | ernsteiswuerfel <erhard_f> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers <toolchain> |
Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | jstein, matoro_bugzilla_gentoo, ppc64 |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | TESTFAILURE |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | PPC64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751970 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=854477 |
||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
build.log.xz
gcc-build-logs.tar.bz2 emerge --info build.log.xz (9.3.0-r2, ppc64) build.log.xz (9.3.0-r2, ppc) |
Created attachment 626360 [details]
gcc-build-logs.tar.bz2
Created attachment 626362 [details]
emerge --info
Created attachment 679062 [details]
build.log.xz (9.3.0-r2, ppc64)
9.3.0-r2 built with current toolchain seems quite an improvement regarding failure count.
[...]
skipping test framework tests, CHECK_TEST_FRAMEWORK is not defined
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 12468
# of unexpected failures 13
# of expected failures 24
# of unsupported tests 284
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0-r2/work/build/gcc/xgcc version 9.3.0 (Gentoo 9.3.0-r2 p4)
Created attachment 697614 [details]
build.log.xz (9.3.0-r2, ppc)
41 failures on ppc (vs. 13 on ppc64).
[...]
skipping test framework tests, CHECK_TEST_FRAMEWORK is not defined
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 2108
# of unexpected failures 41
# of unexpected successes 4
# of expected failures 15
# of unresolved testcases 1
# of unsupported tests 139
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0-r2/work/build/gcc/xgcc version 9.3.0 (Gentoo 9.3.0-r2 p4)
gcc 9 is masked now. Do you want to retest with more recent versions and bring this forward, or drop it? (In reply to matoro from comment #5) > gcc 9 is masked now. Do you want to retest with more recent versions and > bring this forward, or drop it? Let's close. (In reply to Sam James from comment #6) > (In reply to matoro from comment #5) > > gcc 9 is masked now. Do you want to retest with more recent versions and > > bring this forward, or drop it? > > Let's close. ... btw, this doesn't mean the bug was/is worthless: it's really helpful to have historical comparisons to know if things are getting worse/better, especially when stabling. |
Created attachment 626358 [details] build.log.xz [...] Running /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/gcc-9.3.0/gcc/testsuite/gcc.test-framework/test-framework.exp ... skipping test framework tests, CHECK_TEST_FRAMEWORK is not defined === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 15092 # of unexpected failures 223 # of expected failures 17 # of unsupported tests 153 /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/build/gcc/xgcc version 9.3.0 (Gentoo 9.3.0 p1) make[3]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/build/gcc' make[2]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/build/gcc' make[1]: Target 'check-host' not remade because of errors. make[1]: Leaving directory '/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0/work/build' make: *** [Makefile:2323: do-check] Error 2 make: Target 'check' not remade because of errors. * ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-9.3.0::gentoo failed (test phase): * emake failed