Summary: | dev-lisp/roswell-19.12.13.103 : fails to build with -fno-common or gcc-10 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Toralf Förster <toralf> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Danny <sheepduke> |
Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | proxy-maint, sam |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733152 | ||
Whiteboard: | ~arch only | ||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 705764 | ||
Attachments: |
emerge-info.txt
dev-lisp:roswell-19.12.13.103:20200222-021722.log emerge-history.txt environment etc.portage.tbz2 logs.tbz2 temp.tbz2 Build log on Danny's machine gcc -v |
Description
Toralf Förster
2020-02-22 03:29:11 UTC
Created attachment 615014 [details]
emerge-info.txt
Created attachment 615016 [details]
dev-lisp:roswell-19.12.13.103:20200222-021722.log
Created attachment 615018 [details]
emerge-history.txt
Created attachment 615020 [details]
environment
Created attachment 615022 [details]
etc.portage.tbz2
Created attachment 615024 [details]
logs.tbz2
Created attachment 615026 [details]
temp.tbz2
I could not reproduct it on my system. Compiler: gcc version 9.2.0 (Gentoo 9.2.0-r4 p5) Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Do you have any extra ld configurations? (In reply to Danny from comment #8) > Do you have any extra ld configurations? except -fno-common ? No Created attachment 615672 [details]
Build log on Danny's machine
(In reply to Danny from comment #10) > Created attachment 615672 [details] > Build log on Danny's machine It is strange that I still cannot reproduce it. Related snippets in make.conf file: CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe -fno-common" CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" FEATURES="nostrip buildpkg parallel-fetch" CPU_FLAGS_X86="aes avx avx2 f16c fma3 mmx mmxext pclmul popcnt sse sse2 sse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 sse4a ssse3" I noticed that you have something like "html_sbcl-xxx" in your build log, while I do not have it. Do you have any clue? (In reply to Danny from comment #11) > (In reply to Danny from comment #10) > > Created attachment 615672 [details] > > Build log on Danny's machine > > It is strange that I still cannot reproduce it. Note that ago actually hit this in bug 733152 too, although it wasn't the focus there. My only guess here is that maybe GCC 10 is stricter? Can you reproduce it with GCC 10 in e.g. a chroot? Created attachment 651344 [details]
gcc -v
(In reply to Sam James from comment #12) > (In reply to Danny from comment #11) > > (In reply to Danny from comment #10) > > > Created attachment 615672 [details] > > > Build log on Danny's machine > > > > It is strange that I still cannot reproduce it. > > Note that ago actually hit this in bug 733152 too, although it wasn't the > focus there. > > My only guess here is that maybe GCC 10 is stricter? Can you reproduce it > with GCC 10 in e.g. a chroot? I am using GCC 10 on my machine. Still cannot hit it :-( I can build it now at least, let's take that as a win! (In reply to Sam James from comment #15) > I can build it now at least, let's take that as a win! I am glad it worked for you! :D |