| Summary: | net-misc/linuxptp-2.0: error: unknown type name 'clockid_t' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Marek Szuba <marecki> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe> |
| Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.debian.org/916966 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | nettstamp-systypes.patch | ||
(In reply to Marek Szuba from comment #0) > Created attachment 612402 [details, diff] [details, diff] > nettstamp-systypes.patch > > I have observed this recently while attempting to rebuild > net-misc/linuxptp-2.0 on an up-to-date otherwise-stable amd64 system. > According to a Debian bug I have found, this is related to changes made in > glibc before release 2.28. > > Attaching a patch which fixes the problem. It is functionally the same as > the one from the aforementioned Debian bug but adapted to work on 2.0 > sources. As <glibc-2.30-r8 is package masked, do you think we still need these patches? Otherwise I will close the bug. |
Created attachment 612402 [details, diff] nettstamp-systypes.patch I have observed this recently while attempting to rebuild net-misc/linuxptp-2.0 on an up-to-date otherwise-stable amd64 system. According to a Debian bug I have found, this is related to changes made in glibc before release 2.28. Attaching a patch which fixes the problem. It is functionally the same as the one from the aforementioned Debian bug but adapted to work on 2.0 sources.