| Summary: | sci-visualization/pythonprop, dev-python/basemap: need porting to py3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michał Górny <mgorny> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | dev, pacho, python, sci-electronics, sci-geosciences |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PMASKED |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=484270 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 694800, 706464 | ||
| Attachments: |
basemap-1.1.0.ebuild
pythonprop-0.28.ebuild |
||
|
Description
Michał Górny
2020-01-17 09:45:24 UTC
Created attachment 603574 [details] basemap-1.1.0.ebuild Let me first propose an ebuild for dev-python/basemap-1.1.0. There have been no API-changes since 1.0.6 (see API_CHANGES), so we're good here as well. Please also note here that upstream switched from sourceforge to GitHub[0]. [0]:https://github.com/matplotlib/basemap Created attachment 603576 [details] pythonprop-0.28.ebuild Let me secondly propose an ebuild for sci-visualization/pythonprop-0.28. Please also note here that upstream switched from sourceforge to GitHub[0] in 2015, so the metadata.xml needs to be changed as well. There, version 0.29 was released, but not added to the website. [0]:https://github.com/jawatson/pythonprop Why not basemap-1.2.1? (In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #3) > Why not basemap-1.2.1? The 1.2.1 is just a tag, not a release, so I went with a more careful approach. I don't know what is preferred here, but nothing speaks against using the tag. (In reply to Laslo Hunhold from comment #1) > Created attachment 603574 [details] > basemap-1.1.0.ebuild > > Let me first propose an ebuild for dev-python/basemap-1.1.0. There have been > no API-changes since 1.0.6 (see API_CHANGES), so we're good here as well. This can not possibly work, did you test it? >=sci-libs/geos-3.3.1[python,${PYTHON_USEDEP}] sci-libs/geos never provided python3 support, and 3.8.0-r1 just dropped USE python as it was abandoned upstream. I have a working 0.29 which uses not only python3 but also migrated from basemap to cartopy. There is also a working prototype for a cartopy ebuild. It just needs some more love. (should we place that one in dev-python or sci-libs ?) The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=512444f70287565a3fb9e8c6e4c0f1f649c756bd commit 512444f70287565a3fb9e8c6e4c0f1f649c756bd Author: Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-03-30 05:48:22 +0000 Commit: Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-03-30 05:52:46 +0000 sci-visualization/pythonprop: Version bump New version supports Python3 and replaces dependency on dev-python/basemap with sci-libs/cartopy. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/705646 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.96, Repoman-2.3.22 Signed-off-by: Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@gentoo.org> sci-visualization/pythonprop/Manifest | 1 + .../pythonprop/pythonprop-0.29.ebuild | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+) |