Summary: | net-p2p/retroshare-0.6.5 stable request | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Andrius Štikonas <andrius> | ||||||
Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | Gioacchino Mazzurco <gio> | ||||||
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||||||||
Severity: | normal | CC: | asturm, mattst88, proxy-maint | ||||||
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | CC-ARCHES | ||||||
Version: | unspecified | Flags: | nattka:
sanity-check+
|
||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Package list: |
=net-p2p/retroshare-0.6.5 amd64 x86
|
Runtime testing required: | --- | ||||||
Bug Depends on: | 699164 | ||||||||
Bug Blocks: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Andrius Štikonas
2019-10-12 20:42:02 UTC
I agree on stabilizing 0.6.5 but I am just a proxy maintainer, I don't know if I can do it on myself and in that case how do that. Created attachment 633254 [details]
ebuild modified to compile with libressl
Hi,
It would be nice to have a bump for retroshare. By the way, it compiles fine with libressl (and runs fine on my hardware (amd64) ) so I slightly modified the ebuild to make it compile with libressl.
Cheers
Created attachment 634004 [details]
ebuild with libressl support V2
Please test this ebuild which have other fixes in dependencies too, if it works file I'll open a pull request ASAP, and thanks for your contribution!
Fixing format so it can proceed. Current version does not compile with newer compilers. (In reply to Gioacchino Mazzurco from comment #3) > Created attachment 634004 [details] > ebuild with libressl support V2 > > Please test this ebuild which have other fixes in dependencies too, if it > works file I'll open a pull request ASAP, and thanks for your contribution! It works fine but you need to remove "dev-libs/openssl:0=" in RDEPEND. Otherwise it fails as I have openssl masked on my system. This controls it : libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl:0= ) !libressl? ( dev-libs/openssl:0= ) If libressl use is set, then it uses libressl if libressl use is unset, then it uses openssl instead amd64 stable x86 stable. Closing. Any objections to cleanup 0.6.3-r2 and 0.6.4-r1? (In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #8) > Any objections to cleanup 0.6.3-r2 and 0.6.4-r1? No objection from me (proxymaint here) The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=bc4e11b46948e7d3fb18e80293c639988fc4869d commit bc4e11b46948e7d3fb18e80293c639988fc4869d Author: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-05-21 17:14:15 +0000 Commit: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-05-21 18:13:36 +0000 net-p2p/retroshare: Drop 0.6.3-r2 and 0.6.4-r1 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/697578 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.22 Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> net-p2p/retroshare/Manifest | 2 - .../files/retroshare-0.6.3-fix-comment.patch | 19 --- .../files/retroshare-0.6.4-qt-5.11.patch | 63 -------- net-p2p/retroshare/metadata.xml | 2 - net-p2p/retroshare/retroshare-0.6.3-r2.ebuild | 160 --------------------- net-p2p/retroshare/retroshare-0.6.4-r1.ebuild | 155 -------------------- 6 files changed, 401 deletions(-) *** Bug 726504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |