Summary: | sys-apps/portage-2.3.76 : Repository Constraints failure | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Manfred Knick <Manfred.Knick> |
Component: | Unclassified | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Manfred Knick
2019-10-02 10:53:49 UTC
# ll repos.conf/ ... -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 95 6. Apr 2017 mkn_local_overlay.conf # cat repos.conf/mkn_local_overlay.conf <----- [mkn_local_overlay] priority = 111 location = /usr/local/portage/local-overlay auto-sync = No # ll /usr/local/portage/ drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4,0K 10. Jun 16:50 local-overlay To clarify, you're reporting that app-emulation/vmware-workstation:0::mkn_local_overlay is ineffective in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords? If so, that's surprising, because it's supposed to work. (In reply to Zac Medico from comment #2) > app-emulation/vmware-workstation:0::mkn_local_overlay Yes, Zac, indeed, with . . . app-emulation/vmware-workstation:0::mkn_local_overlay in /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords/vm, the corresponding package remained masked as "~". Another hint: Running eix-update && eix-test-obsolete, I remember an Error Message during the way - something like "... repository 'mkn_local_overlay' not contained in ..." Having applied the non-restricted enablement and the corresponding emerges, this has gone. Htmh Does /usr/local/portage/local-overlay/profiles/repo_name exist? Does it contain the string "mkn_local_overlay"? (In reply to Mike Gilbert from comment #5) # ll /usr/local/portage/local-overlay/profiles/repo_name -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18 9. Sep 2013 /usr/local/portage/local-overlay/profiles/repo_name # cat /usr/local/portage/local-overlay/profiles/repo_name mkn_local_overlay (In reply to Mike Gilbert from comment #5) Only "difference" that strikes to my mind: Name := mkn_local_overlay Location := local-overlay ........... ^^^^ But that has been and still is in accordance to the man_page. |