Summary: | file-collisions with unifont | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Daniel Herzog <expose> |
Component: | [OLD] Unspecified | Assignee: | Gentoo Fonts Team <fonts> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | minor | CC: | denilsonsa, jesus.de.santos, jieryn, nanikata15, sascha-gentoo-bugzilla, wundo |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Daniel Herzog
2004-10-30 14:01:33 UTC
Are you installing this package for the first time? If you aren't, it might have been broken for uninstall. What do `ls /usr/share/fonts/unifont` and `epm -qf /usr/share/fonts/unifont/fonts` say? (epm is in app-portage/epm) root@hoshino expose # epm -qf /usr/share/fonts/unifont/fonts.dir file /usr/share/fonts/unifont/fonts.dir is not owned by any package I was doing a tree rebuild. This means it was a re-emerge of unifont so it is hardly possible that there was a unclean uninstall... Do you use xfs? the xfs init script (re)generates these files. This bug is directly related to bug #70354. I suggest fixing font.eclass and using it in media-fonts/unifont, too. Noone seems to work on that, bug #70354 is even closed. *** Bug 134310 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 142836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Coming from Bug 142836, I don't understand why this bug is closed and marked as WONTFIX. I think that fonts ebuilds should regenerate the cache and shouldn't overwrite the ones you have in your machine. Could anybody explain me? *** Bug 161816 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 173663 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 214511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |