| Summary: | sys-apps/utempter-0.5.5.5 compile failure in uclibc environment + QA issues | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Daniel Black (RETIRED) <dragonheart> |
| Component: | [OLD] Library | Assignee: | Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) <seemant> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | embedded, greg_g, ps.m, x11 |
| Priority: | High | Keywords: | Inclusion |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | PPC | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Attachments: | solves missing utmpx on uclibc | ||
|
Description
Daniel Black (RETIRED)
2004-10-29 16:32:40 UTC
Xorg -r2 has !uclibc? ( xterm ) thankfully now if only it had a few more keywords: # fgrep KEY x11-base/xorg-x11/* x11-base/xorg-x11/xorg-x11-6.7.0-r2.ebuild:KEYWORDS="arm alpha amd64 hppa ia64 mips ppc ppc64 ~sparc x86" x11-base/xorg-x11/xorg-x11-6.8.0-r1.ebuild:KEYWORDS="arm alpha amd64 hppa ia64 mips ~ppc sparc x86" x11-base/xorg-x11/xorg-x11-6.8.0-r2.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~x86" It's still hard-masked, silly -- I'm not done screwing with it. Keywords are unimportant. Feel free to break your system of any arch if you so choose. =) Although really, it ought to work -- just not very well tested. Unless I'm doing something silly (again!) xterm worked without utempter But did you get the utmp/wtmp entries? Sure it should. utempwer is only used so xterm itself does not have to be setuid anymore in order to be able to log to wtmp. I think the the idea is to use 1 setuid vs a bunch of terms(eterm/rvxt..) being suid. So yeah xterm should work just fine :) *** Bug 74518 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 46059 [details, diff]
solves missing utmpx on uclibc
this is the solution for utempter does not build bug (that was marked as
duplicate)
Cool, we'll get this in. That way I can change the xterm dep to minimal instead of uclibc. Could you please send the patch to the upstream maintainer? That info should be in the rpm's spec file. Keep us posted on this. due to the fact that utmpx.h is SuSv3 requirement, it will be added to uclibc so sending this upstream won't be a good idea I spoke with the upstream maintainer yesterday and he said RH would be moving to libutempter as soon as reasonably possible. This will apparently leave utempter unmaintained, so we should also start looking at other solutions such as libutempter. Any idea when utmpx will get into uclibc? Is this a patch worth committing? probably wont be implemented until we code it ;) Please include the patch for now. Seemant, can you please add this? hi guys, sorry for the delay on this. utempter-0.5.5.6 is in portage which has this patch being applied. Please test and confirm. (In reply to comment #16) > hi guys, sorry for the delay on this. utempter-0.5.5.6 is in portage which has this patch being applied. Please test and confirm. uclibc and utempter-0.5.5.6 works for me with Keyword ~x86. Thanks! |