Summary: | app-misc/zygrib-8.0.1-r1 w/ >=sci-libs/proj-6: /.../proj_api.h:37:2: error: #error To use the proj_api.h you must define the macro ACCEPT_USE_OF_DEPRECATED_PROJ_API_H | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Toralf Förster <toralf> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | kripton, sam, treecleaner |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PMASKED |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://github.com/opengribs/XyGrib/issues/200 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 729098 | ||
Attachments: |
emerge-info.txt
app-misc:zygrib-8.0.1-r1:20190515-213255.log emerge-history.txt environment etc.portage.tbz2 temp.tbz2 |
Description
Toralf Förster
2019-05-16 07:38:21 UTC
Created attachment 576830 [details]
emerge-info.txt
Created attachment 576832 [details]
app-misc:zygrib-8.0.1-r1:20190515-213255.log
Created attachment 576834 [details]
emerge-history.txt
Created attachment 576836 [details]
environment
Created attachment 576838 [details]
etc.portage.tbz2
Created attachment 576840 [details]
temp.tbz2
Just a note: It seems that zyGrib project is not maintained (the last version 4 years ago) but there is a maintained fork called xyGrib - see https://opengribs.org/ Maybe it's a good idea to create ebuild for xyGrib instead of fixing the old zyGrib. This package is broken for a long time. Should it be treecleaned? The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=27ae2afb66dadac740568bd610446231fd56756a commit 27ae2afb66dadac740568bd610446231fd56756a Author: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2020-07-15 12:16:04 +0000 Commit: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2020-07-15 12:27:36 +0000 app-misc/zygrib: Fix build with >=sci-libs/proj-6 One interwebz search later... This is just a life-support commit and will break again with PROJ-8. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686078 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.103, Repoman-2.3.23 Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org> app-misc/zygrib/files/zygrib-8.0.1-proj-6.patch | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ app-misc/zygrib/zygrib-8.0.1-r1.ebuild | 5 ++++- 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) I'd really like to look at unmasking PROJ 8 soon, if possible. The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=50c2672205be2a102bbd5f5f34e1c26887143dd8 commit 50c2672205be2a102bbd5f5f34e1c26887143dd8 Author: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2021-10-27 06:33:01 +0000 Commit: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2021-10-27 06:33:01 +0000 app-misc/zygrib: depend on < PROJ 8 for now Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686078 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> app-misc/zygrib/{zygrib-8.0.1-r1.ebuild => zygrib-8.0.1-r2.ebuild} | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (In reply to eNca from comment #7) > Just a note: > > It seems that zyGrib project is not maintained (the last version 4 years > ago) but there is a maintained fork called xyGrib - see > https://opengribs.org/ > > Maybe it's a good idea to create ebuild for xyGrib instead of fixing the old > zyGrib. Ping, mschiff please look at doing this if it's feasible. (In reply to Sam James from comment #12) > (In reply to eNca from comment #7) > > Just a note: > > > > It seems that zyGrib project is not maintained (the last version 4 years > > ago) but there is a maintained fork called xyGrib - see > > https://opengribs.org/ > > > > Maybe it's a good idea to create ebuild for xyGrib instead of fixing the old > > zyGrib. > > Ping, mschiff please look at doing this if it's feasible. ping I had the same idea regarding xygrib. Thanks for the ping, will look into it asap I started creating an ebuild for xygrib, but its a bit more work than I'd expected and I do not have an ETA when it will be finished now. So to speed things up, I would be OK with lastriting ZyGrib now, so its not in the way anymore. What do you think? The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=6643741dc23ca9a56ad6eb15e9241e83a7323fe0 commit 6643741dc23ca9a56ad6eb15e9241e83a7323fe0 Author: Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-07-30 03:45:21 +0000 Commit: Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-07-30 03:45:21 +0000 profiles: last-rite app-misc/zygrib Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/637150 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686078 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/733066 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/733068 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/828986 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/854744 Signed-off-by: Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@gentoo.org> profiles/package.mask | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) The bug has been closed via the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=871c9b356e0c940d25c204726fca91b300c94604 commit 871c9b356e0c940d25c204726fca91b300c94604 Author: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2022-08-29 08:06:11 +0000 Commit: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2022-08-29 08:07:21 +0000 app-misc/zygrib: treeclean Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/637150 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/828986 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/854744 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686078 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/733066 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/733068 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org> app-misc/zygrib/Manifest | 6 -- app-misc/zygrib/files/zygrib-8.0.1-libs.patch | 20 ------- app-misc/zygrib/files/zygrib-8.0.1-proj-6.patch | 20 ------- app-misc/zygrib/files/zygrib-8.0.1-qt-5.15.patch | 38 ------------- app-misc/zygrib/files/zygrib.desktop | 11 ---- app-misc/zygrib/metadata.xml | 10 ---- app-misc/zygrib/zygrib-8.0.1-r2.ebuild | 71 ------------------------ profiles/package.mask | 7 --- 8 files changed, 183 deletions(-) |