| Summary: | sci-libs/gsl-2.5 stabilisation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm> |
| Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | Gentoo Science Related Packages <sci> |
| Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | gabemarcano, sci |
| Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
| Version: | unspecified | Flags: | stable-bot:
sanity-check+
|
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: |
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12323 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688742 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700196 |
||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: |
sci-libs/gsl-2.5
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
| Bug Depends on: | 687342, 687126 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Andreas Sturmlechner
2019-05-12 09:13:02 UTC
Oh well... sparc stable x86 stopped due to bug 685692. amd64 stable Hi Andreas, Its dependency virtual/cblas has no stable ebuild to provide. Please stablize virtual/cblas first. Benda I don't see that as my job - why did you drop last stable virtual/cblas? (In reply to Andreas Sturmlechner from comment #6) > I don't see that as my job - why did you drop last stable virtual/cblas? Oh, I am sorry. That was my mistake. I though cblas-1.0 is too old. Let me add it back for the moment. Benda My mistake has been reverted. Please continue the stabilization procedures. Sorry for the confusion. Did the revert also nuke the virtual changes for blas, lapack, etc.? virtual/blas-3.8, which included support for the new sci-libs/lapack package, are no longer in the tree. Was this intentional or collateral damage? This is the wrong bug to discuss it, but see https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12332 for what was reverted. Thanks. Yes, I had found that series of commits reverting those changes, the thing is those commits undid more than just restoring the blas-1.0 packages. If I can't find a bug report on the removal of virtual/blas-3.8 and other similar ebuilds, I'll file one. Closing then... |
