Summary: | dev-java/ant-1.{9.13,10.5}: please stabilize the package and the deps | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Miroslav Šulc <fordfrog> |
Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | Java team <java> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alonbl |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Version: | unspecified | Flags: | stable-bot:
sanity-check+
|
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
dev-java/ant-antlr-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-antlr-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-bcel-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-bcel-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-bsf-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-bsf-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-log4j-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-log4j-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-oro-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-oro-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-regexp-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-regexp-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-resolver-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-resolver-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-xalan2-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-apache-xalan2-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-commons-logging-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-commons-logging-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-commons-net-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-commons-net-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-core-1.10.5-r1 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-core-1.9.13-r1 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-jai-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-jai-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-javamail-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-javamail-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-jdepend-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-jdepend-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-jmf-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-jmf-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-jsch-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-jsch-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-junit-1.10.5-r1 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-junit-1.9.13-r1 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-junitlauncher-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-junit4-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-junit4-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-swing-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-swing-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-testutil-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-testutil-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-1.9.13 amd64 ppc64 x86
dev-java/ant-1.10.5 amd64 ppc64 x86
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 656044, 662168, 662892 |
Description
Miroslav Šulc
2019-02-26 19:51:55 UTC
please use the packages list field before we can proceed (you can find other STABLEREQ bugs doing so) added to the package list. also added archs to cc (i thought i did that when creating the bug, probably not...) x86 stable amd64 stable amd64 stable Hi, Is it intentional that =dev-java/ant-1.10.5 is not in the list? (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #6) > Hi, > Is it intentional that =dev-java/ant-1.10.5 is not in the list? no, it was not intentional. i did not notice that. thank you for letting me know. it was caused by my incorrect ls command that i used to collect the ebuilds. both dev-jav/ant versions where supposed to be stabilized aswell. i added them to the list now. Hi, Please stabilize =dev-java/ant-1.10.5 as well. Stable users get conflict as stable packages are pulled downgrade. Thanks! (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #8) > Hi, > Please stabilize =dev-java/ant-1.10.5 as well. > Stable users get conflict as stable packages are pulled downgrade. > Thanks! done! :-) (In reply to Miroslav Šulc from comment #9) > (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #8) > > Hi, > > Please stabilize =dev-java/ant-1.10.5 as well. > > Stable users get conflict as stable packages are pulled downgrade. > > Thanks! > > done! :-) Oh! you are arch as well? Good! Why don't you use the Bug: label?[1] [1] https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0066.html (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #10) > Oh! you are arch as well? Good! > Why don't you use the Bug: label?[1] > > [1] https://www.gentoo.org/glep/glep-0066.html i'm not. but as the tree was broken and this package is just a "meta" package without any real sources and i tested that package on amd64 (and i am also the author of the bump), i decided to fix it immediately rather than leave it broken. if i did something that was not appropriate, i can revert it back to the broken state and leave the resolution to arch teams. wrt bug label, i did not notice that arch teams would use it. i can see only stuff like this in the log (and not for every stabilization commit): RepoMan-Options: --include-arches="amd64" otherwise i would use that bug label too. ppc64 stable amd64 stable |