Bug 66996 – net-wireless/openwrt-cvs-20040807 fails to get patchomatic snapshot

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED INVALID

[Description lison 2004-10-10 10:22:00 UTC]

It tries to download:
ftp://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic/snapshot/patch-o-matic-20040916.tar.bz2

Checking ftp://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic/snapshot/, there are no September snapshot anymore.


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

[Comment 1 solar (RETIRED) 2004-10-10 12:11:02 UTC]

mobile I'll get this one.

[Comment 2 Henrik Brix Andersen 2004-10-11 08:31:46 UTC]

Please add mobile@g.o to CC: when claiming mobile bug. :)

[Comment 3 solar (RETIRED) 2004-10-11 08:47:41 UTC]

heh.. I suppose.. this falls more under embedded that what you guys call mobile.
The metadata shows embedded as the herd and myself as the maintainer. So whoever assigned this to mobile@ did not even pay attention and incorrectly assigned it.

[Comment 4 solar (RETIRED) 2004-10-13 05:10:09 UTC]

masked till further notice.

[Comment 5 Henrik Brix Andersen 2004-11-01 05:51:51 UTC]

Removing mobile@ from CC:

[Comment 6 mordjah 2005-02-05 10:31:24 UTC]

is there a (relativlely) simple way to work-around this? or just easier to crad the cvs buildtree?

[Comment 7 solar (RETIRED) 2005-02-05 16:48:18 UTC]

It's better to just fetch a current openwrt from cvs yourself. The ebuild was 
mainly introduced as a way for me to test and devel for owrt on a number of boxes.
Once Kaloz has an updated linux-2.4.29 tree ready to go and our 
x86-glibc -> mipsel-uclibc cross support is in a little bit of a better shape we 
may add an embedded sub profile or a catalyst spec for building such devices at 
gentoo.

Note to self: remove openwrt-cvs from the tree.

[Comment 8 solar (RETIRED) 2005-02-05 16:49:07 UTC]

lison, you can also update the cvs ebuild yourself and put it into a portage overlay.

[Comment 9 solar (RETIRED) 2005-03-14 19:41:38 UTC]

openwrt-cvs ebuild is no longer in the tree. closing bug