Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 653884

Summary: [Future EAPI] Provide the equivalent of EPATCH_EXCLUDE to for eapply
Product: Gentoo Hosted Projects Reporter: Anthony Basile <blueness>
Component: PMS/EAPIAssignee: PMS/EAPI <pms>
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX    
Severity: normal CC: esigra, kernel, mgorny, toolchain
Priority: Normal    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 174380    

Description Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2018-04-23 12:53:52 UTC
eapply is not a simple drop in for epatch from epatch.eclass. In particular, there is no equilalent to EPATCH_EXCLUDE.  This is useful for some ebuilds where we have large patchsets but would like to exclude one or a few patches.

See https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/8084

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Anthony Basile gentoo-dev 2018-04-23 12:55:31 UTC
I can also see this as useful for kernel patchsets as well as toolchain patchsets.
Comment 2 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev 2018-04-23 13:05:13 UTC
(In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #0)
> eapply is not a simple drop in for epatch from epatch.eclass.

Right, and it wasn't meant as one.

> In particular, there is no equilalent to EPATCH_EXCLUDE.  This is useful for
> some ebuilds where we have large patchsets but would like to exclude one or
> a few patches.

Use epatch if you need its extended features. eapply has been kept simple intentionally, and I don't think that adding epatch's baroque features is the way to go.
Comment 3 Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2018-04-23 13:33:54 UTC
If your arguments boil down to 'it is useful', then my counter-argument would boil down to 'you are doing it wrong'.  Now, if you want to have a discussion about it, you need to point out examples of why you find it useful, and then I can bring my counter-arguments on how you're doing it wrong.