| Summary: | One month gentoo-project ban for Daniel Robbins (currently <drobbins@funtoo.org>) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Infrastructure | Reporter: | Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge> |
| Component: | Mailing Lists | Assignee: | Gentoo Infrastructure <infra-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | comrel, drobbins, fturco, rdalek1967 |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652240 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Andreas K. Hüttel
2018-04-16 20:51:37 UTC
(In reply to Andreas K. Hüttel from comment #0) > Dear Infra, > > please enact a one-month list ban on gentoo-project for Daniel Robbins > (currently <drobbins@funtoo.org>). > > Rationale: Deliberate public posting of private conversations with the > intention to discredit, see > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-project/message/ > 0499e6fc4444a183b3c5e2ac4ba6579d > > Carried in a comrel team vote with 6 yes votes and 3 team members not > replying. > > Thanks. This is done. -A I have already been banned for these posts. I should not be double-banned. Make sure I am not banned on -nfp. (In reply to Daniel Robbins from comment #3) > Make sure I am not banned on -nfp. I was directed to ban on -project, so that was the only list affected. -A I made the determination that slandering a developer in private is something that is bad. This excerpt was part of a longer conversation where mgorny was trying to brainstorm ways to 'get rid of' shentino. While you may have an official process to handle this that I didn't follow, being a whistleblower for bad behavior on the project is somewhat questionable as a rationale for your continued persecution of me on mailing lists. May I ask what steps are being taken, if any, regarding mgorny's 'behind the scenes' steps to eliminate a developer from the project that he considered a political enemy? And I am assuming that ComRel actually discourages this type of behavior? I am also curious why I had no opportunity to discuss this issue with ComRel, why this "bug" appeared last night of all times for something that was posted quite a long time ago. Ah, this is UTC, so it just happened a few hours ago. Can you guys assure me that this is not retaliations for my ongoing critique of ComRel on the gentoo-nfp mailing list? Do you have logs to back this up? I can't speak to reasoning but give them 24 hours, they are mainly located in the EU. The silence is deafening. |
