Bug 651882 (CVE-2018-7158, CVE-2018-7159, CVE-2018-7160)

Summary:	<net-libs/nodejs-{4.9.0,6.14.0,8.11.0} - multiple vulnerabilities
Product:	Gentoo Security	Reporter:	Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) <jer>
Component:	Vulnerabilities	Assignee:	Gentoo Security <security>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	hydrapolic, patrick
Priority:	Normal
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V8.md
See Also:	https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643510
Whiteboard:	B4 [noglsa cve]
Package list:	=net-libs/nodejs-4.9.0 =net-libs/nodejs-6.14.0 =net-libs/nodejs-8.11.0 =net-libs/http-parser-2.8.1 =dev-libs/libuv-1.20.0	Runtime testing required:	---
Bug Depends on:	641130
Bug Blocks:

Description Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2018-03-29 05:59:49 UTC

Fix for inspector DNS rebinding vulnerability (CVE-2018-7160): A malicious website could use a DNS rebinding attack to trick a web browser to bypass same-origin-policy checks and allow HTTP connections to localhost or to hosts on the local network, potentially to an open inspector port as a debugger, therefore gaining full code execution access. The inspector now only allows connections that have a browser Host value of localhost or localhost6.

Fix for 'path' module regular expression denial of service (CVE-2018-7158): A regular expression used for parsing POSIX paths could be used to cause a denial of service if an attacker were able to have a specially crafted path string passed through one of the impacted 'path' module functions.


Reject spaces in HTTP Content-Length header values (CVE-2018-7159): The Node.js HTTP parser allowed for spaces inside Content-Length header values. Such values now lead to rejected connections in the same way as non-numeric values.

Comment 1 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev

2018-04-14 10:32:34 UTC

*** Bug 643510 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Michael Boyle 2018-04-24 02:13:59 UTC

Hello!
@maintainers, is there a status for his bug?

Michael Boyle
Gentoo Security Padawan

Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2018-04-24 05:42:19 UTC

(In reply to Michael Boyle from comment #2)
> @maintainers, is there a status for his bug?

Yes, apparently it's "CONFIRMED".

Comment 4 Mikle Kolyada archtester

2018-04-24 07:25:37 UTC

(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #3)
> (In reply to Michael Boyle from comment #2)
> > @maintainers, is there a status for his bug?
> 
> Yes, apparently it's "CONFIRMED".

silly jokes are not welcome, if you can't help yourself making them, please find better place than bugzilla

Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2018-04-24 19:04:40 UTC

(In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Michael Boyle from comment #2)
> > > @maintainers, is there a status for his bug?
> > 
> > Yes, apparently it's "CONFIRMED".
> 
> silly jokes are not welcome, if you can't help yourself making them, please
> find better place than bugzilla

They're not?

Comment 6 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2018-05-20 20:57:20 UTC

GLSA Vote: No