Summary: | sys-apps/portage-2.3.19-r1: catalyst stage1 build pulls in static-dev to satisfy virtual/dev-manager dependency | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Zac Medico <zmedico> |
Component: | Core - Dependencies | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alexander |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | InVCS, REGRESSION |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645002 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 645194 |
Description
Zac Medico
2018-01-20 23:54:18 UTC
Patch posted for review: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage-dev/message/d6778327aceb43acf1ee45755a3b0276 https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/245 This bit me hard. I automate dozens of catalyst runs and they are all broken now. I can't really wait too long. What is the confidence in this patch? The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=74d0f516a346c7fb6c52a2508ca16b8949b3b65f commit 74d0f516a346c7fb6c52a2508ca16b8949b3b65f Author: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2018-01-21 00:00:02 +0000 Commit: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2018-01-21 00:09:11 +0000 dep_zapdeps: exclude virtuals from new_slot_count (bug 645190) Fix new_slot_count to exclude virtual packages, since they are considered to have zero-cost. This solves an issue where the catalyst stage1 build would unexpectedly pull in static-dev to satisfy virtual/dev-manager, but eudev is the preferred choice. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/645190 Fixes: 9fdaf9bdbdf5 ("dep_check: use DNF to optimize overlapping virtual || deps (bug 632026)") Reported-by: Ben Kohler <bkohler@gmail.com> pym/portage/dep/dep_check.py | 3 +- .../resolver/test_virtual_minimize_children.py | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)} (In reply to Anthony Basile from comment #2) > This bit me hard. I automate dozens of catalyst runs and they are all > broken now. I can't really wait too long. What is the confidence in this > patch? The patch is ready to use. You also need the patch from bug 645002. You can get them both here: https://github.com/gentoo/portage/compare/e81497dec819dbfc8e85e533db30d751fadaad81...74d0f516a346c7fb6c52a2508ca16b8949b3b65f.patch This is released in portage-2.3.20. virtual/dev-manager needs a revbump. (In reply to Michael Cook from comment #6) > virtual/dev-manager needs a revbump. Thanks, done: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=e4821e616033d658c494780b1ec66bdace912071 |