Bug 64423 – emerge openoffice fails during compile: unknown switch <-I>

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED NEEDINFO

[Description Mehmet Giritli 2004-09-17 11:15:46 UTC]

emerge openoffice fails.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.emerge openoffice
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
------------------------------
Making: ../../unxlngi4.pro/srs/dbwizres.srs
echo dbwizres.src
dbwizres.src
rsc -presponse @/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.61/temp/mkAzk6uH
VCL Resource Compiler 3.0
Preprocessor commandline:  -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC -DC300 -DSUPD=645 -DPRODUCT
-DPRODUCT_FULL -DNDEBUG -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DUPDVER="645" -DUPDVER="645"
dbwizres.src /var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.61/temp/fileUykXXJ
Preprocessor startline:  rscpp
@/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.61/temp/fileEoDSeq
Rsc2 commandline: rsc2 @/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.61/temp/fileMMnQI6
f263: Error: Unknown switch <-I.>.
Terminating compiler
Error starting rsc2 compiler
dmake:  Error code 1, while making '../../unxlngi4.pro/srs/dbwizres.srs'
---* TG_SLO.MK *---
dmake:  Error code 255, while making 'SRC2'
---* TG_SLO.MK *---

ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/var/tmp/portage/openoffice-ximian-1.1.61/work/oo_1.1.2_src/wizards/source/formwizard

!!! ERROR: app-office/openoffice-ximian-1.1.61 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 385, Exitcode 1
!!! Build failed!


Expected Results:  
sucessfully emerge openoffice

Portage 2.0.50-r11 (default-x86-2004.0, gcc-3.3.4, glibc-2.3.3.20040420-r1,
2.6.8-gentoo-r3)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.8-gentoo-r3 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2200+
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16
distcc 2.16 i686-pc-linux-gnu (protocols 1 and 2) (default port 3632) [enabled]
ccache version 2.3 [enabled]
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r4
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.5-r1
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O3 -mcpu=i686 -march=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER=""
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3.2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config
/usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref
/usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/
/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/
/usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -mcpu=i686 -march=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs ccache distcc sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://sunsite.cnlab-switch.ch/ftp/mirror/gentoo/
ftp://ftp.tu-clausthal.de/pub/linux/gentoo/ http://gentoo.inode.at/"
MAKEOPTS="-j3"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="3dfx 3dnow X aalib acpi alsa apache2 apm arts audiofile avi berkdb
bitmap-fonts bonobo cdr crypt cups divx4linux dvb dvd dvdr encode esd flac
foomaticdb ftp gdbm gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 gtkhtml guile imap imlib
java jpeg kde libg++ libwww mad maildir mikmod mmx motif mozilla mpeg mysql nas
ncurses nls oggvorbis opengl oss pam pdflib perl php png python qt quicktime
readline sdl slang spell sse ssl svga tcltk tcpd tetex tiff truetype unicode usb
wxwindows x86 xine xml2 xmms xprint xv xvid zlib"

[Comment 1 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) 2004-09-26 23:22:17 UTC]

Could it be, that you are using a "hardened" gcc? Also are you sure, that you had enough dis space available for the compile?

[Comment 2 Mehmet Giritli 2004-10-03 13:16:21 UTC]

Nope. I've got plenty of space and I definitely do not use hardened gcc.

[Comment 3 Mehmet Giritli 2004-10-29 13:36:37 UTC]

gcc-config -l
[1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-3.3.4 *


df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md0              150G  109G   34G  77% /

[Comment 4 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) 2005-01-16 09:02:40 UTC]

Is this still happening for you with a more recent version of openoffice-ximian?

[Comment 5 Andreas Proschofsky (RETIRED) 2005-01-24 02:29:44 UTC]

Need more info, please reopen, if you still get it