Summary: | www-apps/postfixadmin-{2.3.8,3.0.2,3.1}: Rename maildirmake to courier-maildirmake in mailbox creation script | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Luke Bratch <luke> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Aaron W. Swenson <titanofold> |
Status: | UNCONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gentoobugs, jstein, mjo, web-apps |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
Patch to rename maildirmake to courier-maildirmake
Patch to rename maildirmake to courier-maildirmake |
Description
Luke Bratch
2018-01-08 19:45:42 UTC
(In reply to Luke Bratch from comment #0) > The attached patch renames the call to maildirmake for all three versions of > www-apps/postfixadmin in Portage. > > Thanks > Luke Thanks for you work on this. However, I'm not sure this is the best course to take. I think net-mail/courier-imap should manage a symlink as, most likely, other scripts and/or packages may be broken by the rename. There's no maintainer for net-mail/courier-imap, but I think we can get a consensus on what to do. In the meantime, as for your patch, that work should not be done in src_unpack but in src_prepare. Would you rework it please? Sorry =( I renamed the binary because mail-mta/netqmail already installs a "maildirmake", so you couldn't use netqmail and courier-imap at the same time. The right way to do it would probably be with eselect, but that feels like overkill. Created attachment 517308 [details, diff] Patch to rename maildirmake to courier-maildirmake (In reply to Aaron W. Swenson from comment #1) > In the meantime, as for your patch, that work should not be done in > src_unpack but in src_prepare. Would you rework it please? No problem, I've made that change, please see the attached patch. I've also added an extra sed to correct the name in the failure message and changed the commit message to look more like other commits in Portage. As for net-mail/courier-imap, I agree that eselect feels overkill, but I'm not sure how else to deal with the conflict. *** Bug 643408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |