Summary: | <app-text/ghostscript-gpl-9.25: multiple vulnerabilities (CVE-2018-{15908,15909,15910,15911,16509,16510,16511,16513,16539,16540,16541,16542,16543,16585,16802}) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Security | Reporter: | GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot <glsamaker> |
Component: | Vulnerabilities | Assignee: | Gentoo Security <security> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | minor | CC: | alexander, cJ-gentoo, printing |
Priority: | Normal | Flags: | stable-bot:
sanity-check+
|
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | B3 [glsa+ cve] | ||
Package list: |
app-text/ghostscript-gpl-9.25
|
Runtime testing required: | --- |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 618820, 626418, 655404 |
Description
GLSAMaker/CVETool Bot
![]() All have been fixed: CVE-2017-9610: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698025 CVE-2017-9611: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698024 CVE-2017-9612: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698026 CVE-2017-9618: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698044 CVE-2017-9619: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698042 CVE-2017-9620: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698050 CVE-2017-9726: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-9726 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698055 CVE-2017-9727: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2017-9727 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698056 CVE-2017-9739: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698063 CVE-2017-9740: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698064 CVE-2017-9835: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697985 Note that ghostscript-9.23 was already released in March. https://ghostscript.com/Ghostscript_9.23.html I haven't checked if all the above fixes are in 9.23, but it's likely, because fixes are quite old. (Bug 634616 is the bump request to 9.22) BTW I know everyone is busy, and many teams are understaffed. But can't we do something, say check the situation every two months or so? I don't know how serious these bugs are, but at least ghostscript is important. Thanks in advance. Best regards. The bug has been referenced in the following commit(s): https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=0a6c1c294b6dfddbec77c9652cf216fafaaae835 commit 0a6c1c294b6dfddbec77c9652cf216fafaaae835 Author: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: 2018-09-18 23:03:21 +0000 Commit: Andreas K. Hüttel <dilfridge@gentoo.org> CommitDate: 2018-09-18 23:03:34 +0000 app-text/ghostscript-gpl: Version bump, bug 635426 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/635426 Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.49, Repoman-2.3.10 app-text/ghostscript-gpl/Manifest | 2 + .../ghostscript-gpl/ghostscript-gpl-9.25.ebuild | 206 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 208 insertions(+) >
> BTW I know everyone is busy, and many teams are understaffed. But can't we
> do something, say check the situation every two months or so? I don't know
> how serious these bugs are, but at least ghostscript is important.
>
Sorry 'bout that, but I moved to glibc maintenance because that was even more critical...
(In reply to Andreas K. Hüttel from comment #3) Wow. No one can thank you enough. Take care, and please don't sacrifice yourself. Best regards. Arches please stabilize app-text/ghostscript-gpl-9.25 ia64 stable arm64 stable x86 stable Stable on alpha. amd64 stable sparc done. ppc/ppc64 stable s390 stable arm stable hppa stable All arches stable This issue was resolved and addressed in GLSA 201811-12 at https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201811-12 by GLSA coordinator Aaron Bauman (b-man). |