| Summary: | linux26-headers-2.6.5 gone? :( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jesse Adelman <jesse> |
| Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Tim Yamin (RETIRED) <plasmaroo> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | High | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Jesse Adelman
2004-09-09 18:52:24 UTC
I guess I should put what I actually request on this bug... Can we please restore the linux26-headers-2.6.5* branch(es)? toolchain does not maintain headers. (we maintain gcc/libc/binutils) Sorry, I assumed (and we know what that does) that since this impacted glibc and is part of sys-kernel/, this would be part of the "Core System". Should this be re-assigned to a different Bugzilla component? I found the person who removed the ebuild in question in the Changelog (plasmaroo@gentoo.org), adding to the CC-list. ...dont look at me. re-assigning to plasmaroo. wee, magical bouncing bug Any reason why the newer headers would not work? Hmm.... I'm not a glibc expert, but I thought the general rule was that you can have glibc compiled with _older_ headers than the running kernel, but you should not have glibc compiled with _newer_ headers than the running kernel. Hence, my request. At least with MythTV, and the current ivtv drivers, gentoo-dev-sources 2.6.5 appears to be the combination that makes everything run well, as seen in the HOWTO for Gentoo and MythTV mentioned above. I don't know if there is any other package that has such needs, however. This hopefully will change in the future, but a stable MythTV is a joy to have. :) Resurrected, please reopen this bug if you have any issues. However, I don't recommend using 2.6.5-gentoo-dev-sources for security reasons, and I will probably deprecate the 2.6.5 series headers after the next release or two. |