Summary: | app-text/ghostscript-gpl-9.22 version bump | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Mart Raudsepp <leio> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Printing Team <printing> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | major | CC: | alexander, herrtimson, jstein, skau, teika, viklevin2 |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 618820, 620148 | ||
Attachments: | patchset for 9.25 |
Description
Mart Raudsepp
2017-10-18 06:46:17 UTC
ghostscript-9.23 was released in March: https://ghostscript.com/Ghostscript_9.23.html 9.24 is out with security fixes 9.25 is there, fixing security issues further. The upstream news of both 9.25 and 9.24 say "PLEASE NOTE: We strongly urge users to upgrade to this latest release to avoid these issues." * https://www.ghostscript.com/doc/9.24/News.htm * https://www.ghostscript.com/doc/9.25/News.htm The same pages say there hasn't been any incompatible changes (in fact from 9.21) Created attachment 547266 [details]
patchset for 9.25
Let me submit a patchset for 9.25. Changes from ghostscript-gpl-9.21-patchset-1.tar.xz are:
* All *9.21* patches are deleted, which are already applied in the source. Namely, they are:
./patches/ghostscript-9.21-cve-2017-5951.patch
./patches/ghostscript-9.21-cve-2017-7207.patch
./patches/ghostscript-9.21-cve-2017-8291-2.patch
./patches/ghostscript-9.21-cve-2017-8291-3.patch
./patches/ghostscript-9.21-cve-2017-8291-4.patch
./patches/ghostscript-9.21-cve-2017-8291-1.patch
./patches/ghostscript-9.21-system-openjpeg.patch
* Font name patch is updated minimally. The order of some entries were changed in the source, so I followed these changes. Other changes are simply ignored. I renamed the patch filename, by changing "9.20" to "9.25"
ghostscript-9.20-urw-fonts-naming.patch -> ghostscript-9.25-urw-fonts-naming.patch
Comment on attachment 547266 [details]
patchset for 9.25
9.25 already appeared in the official portage tree. Thanks Andreas K. Hüttel!
(In reply to Teika kazura from comment #6) > Comment on attachment 547266 [details] > patchset for 9.25 > > 9.25 already appeared in the official portage tree. Thanks Andreas K. Hüttel! Now these bugs can be closed: bug 618820 bug 626418 bug 635426 bug 655404 |