Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!

Bug 63389

Summary: mirrorselect -a -s4 -o | grep 'GENTOO_MIRRORS=' >> /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf ??
Product: Portage Development Reporter: Richard Ronc <richardronc>
Component: UnclassifiedAssignee: Portage team <dev-portage>
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME    
Severity: trivial    
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: x86   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1&chap=6
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description Richard Ronc 2004-09-09 00:09:29 UTC
When i tried to initiate the selecting fast mirrors section of the install prior to emerge, the line of syntax;

mirrorselect -a -s4 -o | grep 'GENTOO_MIRRORS=' >> /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf

failed to execute. although the doco says this isnt a problem, when i inputed;

mirrorselect -a -s4 -o | grep 'GENTOO_MIRROS=' >> /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf

notice the spelling mistake in "MIRRO(R)S" the line of code executed and seemed to do what ever it was supposed to do.

although i can swear black and blue about this as i have actually documented the syntax for my current install, due to previous failures i thought this might be worth looking at.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. was installing according to the gentoo handbook
2. got to --> mirrorselect -a -s4 -o | grep 'GENTOO_MIRRORS=' >> /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf

3.accidentally entered :mirrorselect -a -s4 -o | grep 'GENTOO_MIRROS=' >> /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf

and it worked.

Actual Results:  
during a previous attempt at install the full correct command did not execute :
mirrorselect -a -s4 -o | grep 'GENTOO_MIRRORS=' >> /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf

with my current install;
mirrorselect -a -s4 -o | grep 'GENTOO_MIRROS=' >> /mnt/gentoo/etc/make.conf
The command ran, and i havent looked back or tried to re-create the error.

Expected Results:  
exactly what the handbook has described for this command, however a spelling
mistake has resulted in the correct execution of the code, whereas the correct
syntax hasnt

(sounds dumb i know, im willing accept its me)
Comment 1 Nicholas Jones (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-09-21 18:05:04 UTC
I imagine it worked, as it has a default anyway.

It's difficult to wrap one's head around working/non-broken reports.