Bug 63381

Summary:	binutils patch fails to apply [Patch: 90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags]
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Rafael Darder Calvo <yo>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers>
Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE
Severity:	major
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	x86
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Rafael Darder Calvo 2004-09-08 19:59:40 UTC

While emerging binutils in bootstrap.sh (gentoo installation)

the patch output is:

***** 90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 *****

===============================================================

PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch
PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p0 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch

===============================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h     2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h     2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 17
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 79
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h     2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h     2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 128
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c        2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c        2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 139
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 157
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h      2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h      2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 188
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em     2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em     2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 224
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y       2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y       2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===============================================================

PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch
PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p1 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch

===============================================================
patching file bfd/elf-bfd.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1215 with fuzz 2 (offset 13 lines).
patching file bfd/elf.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 967.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2300 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 3555 (offset 50 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 4199 (offset 92 lines).
Hunk #5 FAILED at 4751.
2 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/elf.c.rej
patching file bfd/elflink.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1909.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1945.
2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file bfd/elflink.h.rej
patching file binutils/readelf.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2144.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file binutils/readelf.c.rej
patching file include/bfdlink.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 313 with fuzz 2 (offset 11 lines).
patching file include/elf/common.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 289.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/elf/common.h.rej
patching file ld/emultempl/elf32.em
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1704 with fuzz 2 (offset 59 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 1750.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1762.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/emultempl/elf32.em.rej
patching file ld/ldgram.y
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1014.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file ld/ldgram.y.rej
===============================================================

PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch
PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p2 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch

===============================================================
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h     2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h     2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 17
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 79
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h     2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h     2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 128
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c        2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c        2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 139
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 157
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h      2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h      2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 188
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em     2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em     2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 224
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y       2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y       2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===============================================================

PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch
PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p3 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch

===============================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h     2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h     2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 17
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 79 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 79
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h     2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h     2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 128 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 128
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c        2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c        2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 139 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 139
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 157
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h      2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h      2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
can't find file to patch at input line 188
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em     2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em     2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 224 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 224
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y       2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y       2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
===============================================================

PIPE_COMMAND:  bzip2 -dc /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/work/patch/90_all_binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pt-pax-flags.patch.bz2 > /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch
PATCH COMMAND:  patch -p4 -g0 < /var/tmp/portage/binutils-2.14.90.0.8-r1/temp/16357.patch

===============================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 4 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 4
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf-bfd.h     2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf-bfd.h     2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 17 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 17
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elf.c 2004-01-21 17:20:22.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
5 out of 5 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 79 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 79
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/bfd/elflink.h     2004-01-14 22:07:43.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/bfd/elflink.h     2004-01-26 18:58:31.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 128 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 128
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/binutils/readelf.c        2004-01-14 22:07:44.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/binutils/readelf.c        2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 139 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 139
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/bfdlink.h 2004-01-21 17:18:16.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 157 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 157
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/include/elf/common.h      2004-01-14 22:07:51.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/include/elf/common.h      2004-01-26 18:06:02.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 188 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 188
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/emultempl/elf32.em     2004-01-14 22:07:53.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/emultempl/elf32.em     2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored
missing header for unified diff at line 224 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 224
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|diff -Nurp binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y
|--- binutils-2.14.90.0.8-old/ld/ldgram.y       2004-01-14 22:07:52.000000000 +0100
|+++ binutils-2.14.90.0.8-pax/ld/ldgram.y       2004-01-21 06:32:39.000000000 +0100
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored





Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.




Portage 2.0.50-r11 (default-x86-2004.2, gcc-3.3.3, glibc-2.3.3.20040420-r0, 
2.4.26-gentoo-r6) 
================================================================= 
System uname: 2.4.26-gentoo-r6 i686 Celeron (Mendocino) 
Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16 
Autoconf: 
Automake: 
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86" 
AUTOCLEAN="yes" 
CFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium2 -mcpu=pentium2 -pipe -funroll-loops -mmmx 
-fomit-frame-pointer" 
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu" 
COMPILER="" 
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control" 
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" 
CXXFLAGS="-O3 -march=pentium2 -mcpu=pentium2 -pipe -funroll-loops -mmmx 
-fomit-frame-pointer" 
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" 
FEATURES="autoaddcvs ccache sandbox" 
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://gentoo.osuosl.org/" 
MAKEOPTS="-j2" 
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" 
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" 
PORTDIR="/usr/portage" 
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="" 
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" 
USE="X acl acpi alsa apm arts audiofile avi bcmath berkdb bonobo bzlib 
calendar caps cdr cpdflib cross crypt cscope ctype cups curl dbx dvb emacs 
encode ethereal exif fam flac foomaticdb ftp gdbm gif gnome gpm gtk gtk2 guile 
imap imlib jabber java jikes jpeg kde kerberos krb4 ldap libg++ libwww 
linguas_en linguas_es lirc mad mbox mikmod mime mmx mng motif mpeg msn nas 
ncurses nls nocardbus oggvorbis opengl oss pam pdflib plotutils png pnp ppds 
python qt quicktime readline samba scanner sdl sharedmem slang snmp speex 
spell ssl svg svga szip tcpd tetex tiff truetype usb wxwindows x86 xml xml2 
xmlrpc xmms xpm xsl xv zlib"

Comment 1 Mr. Bones. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2004-09-08 20:01:45 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 63359 ***