Summary: | group multiple slots on --depclean | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Bodo Thiesen <bothie> |
Component: | Enhancement/Feature Requests | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | UNCONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | tsmksubc |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Bodo Thiesen
2017-06-09 17:29:36 UTC
The thing is, the list is ordered based on dependencies, so your desired output could conflict with the ordering constraint. Ok, so, question: Does ordering matter at all? (It doesn't to me, up to now I didn't even know there is an intended ordering at all.) And even if it does: At least if dep order wouldn't conflict (like in the easy cases of multiple slots of the same package following immediatelly on each other), the collapsing should be done. |