Summary: | portage isn't dealling too well with rsync *problems* ... heres an idea | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | António Meireles <am> |
Component: | Unclassified | Assignee: | Daniel Robbins (RETIRED) <drobbins> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | mholzer |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 4874 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
António Meireles
2002-08-08 12:45:20 UTC
if you read bellow the third paragraph you'll see that i 'm going far away than the bug you say i 'm duplicating (i 'm not talking alone about rsync congestion - i 'm talking about rsync *time-warps* )... Yep i even *sugest* a feature improvement ... TIA so than this bug report turns into a request for enhancement ;) This isn't really possible with rsync. There are too many factors to deal with. And you shouldn't run into this issue if you only rsync once every hour max. Otherwise you tax the servers. |