Summary: | dev-python/repoze-{who,lru} license | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Alessandro Barbieri <lssndrbarbieri> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Licenses team <licenses> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | openstack, prometheanfire, python |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Alessandro Barbieri
2017-04-04 19:01:35 UTC
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/python-repoze.lru/unstable_copyright for lru Looks like a new license needs to be added? (In reply to Matthew Thode ( prometheanfire ) from comment #2) > Looks like a new license needs to be added? I don't think so. Both ebuilds have LICENSE="repoze" which looks correct to me. IIUC, this bug is about adding repoze to the MISC-FREE license group? so, is this request for the repoze license to be added to the MISC-FREE licence group? (In reply to Matthew Thode ( prometheanfire ) from comment #4) > so, is this request for the repoze license to be added to the MISC-FREE > licence group? If this license is confirmed as free, can be added to the MISC-FREE group? @Licenses team: This is basically the wording of 3-clause BSD plus a 4th clause requiring modified files to be marked as such. Debian considers the license as free, and we have the very similar BSD-with-attribution in MISC-FREE already. So unless there are objections, I am going to add this to the MISC-FREE license group. (In reply to Ulrich Müller from comment #6) > So unless there are objections, Seems there are none. > I am going to add this to the MISC-FREE license group. Done. Thanks for reporting! |