Summary: | emerge (emerge system) fails on @preserved-rebuild | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Nico Baggus <mlspamcb> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Linux bug wranglers <bug-wranglers> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | grknight |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Nico Baggus
2017-03-19 14:55:14 UTC
Additional info: # ls -l /usr/lib/*libbfd* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1211232 7 jun 2016 /usr/lib/libbfd-2.25.1.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1275928 17 mrt 23:01 /usr/lib/libbfd-2.27.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 17 mrt 23:01 /usr/lib/libbfd.so -> libbfd-2.27.so # equery b /usr/lib/libbfd-2.25.1.so * Searching for /usr/lib/libbfd-2.25.1.so ... sys-libs/binutils-libs-2.27 (/usr/lib64/libbfd-2.25.1.so) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 563934 *** ahem... just to state something obvious.... How can this be a duplicate of a revdep-rebuild issue? (Revdep issue could be solved, but that isn;t the case for @preserved-rebuild, one year later)... (In reply to Nico Baggus from comment #3) > ahem... just to state something obvious.... > How can this be a duplicate of a revdep-rebuild issue? > > (Revdep issue could be solved, but that isn;t the case for > @preserved-rebuild, one year later)... I suspect the wranglers saw bug 586108 and did what the toolchain maintainer called a dupe. The real action needed to be taken is to depclean binutils-2.25.1-r1 to solve this issue. This would also be proposed by 'emerge --ask --depclean' which emerge tells you to do after a full world update. Once that is done, a preserved-rebuild will succeed if any references remain. |