Summary: | portageq: Add subcommand `conflicts-subslot` | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED) <kentnl> |
Component: | Core | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alexanderyt |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Kent Fredric (IRC: kent\n) (RETIRED)
![]() Its also important to note that none of this bug cares about the *contents* of the to-be-installed package. It doesn't even have to exist! Its just a question as to whether the VDB *would* allow a theoretical package of a given name:slot/subslot to be installed and what needs to change to make that happen. |