Summary: | dev-python/edpwd: removal (was: support dev-python/pycryptodome) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Michał Górny <mgorny> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | No maintainer - Look at https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers if you want to take care of it <maintainer-needed> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | treecleaner |
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | PMASKED |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 611568 |
Description
Michał Górny
2017-03-03 23:15:40 UTC
In [3]: edpwd.ed.encrypt('test', 'aaa') --------------------------------------------------------------------------- TypeError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipython-input-3-b20e220fbcfa> in <module>() ----> 1 edpwd.ed.encrypt('test', 'aaa') /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/edpwd/ed.pyc in encrypt(key, password) 17 if not password or type(password) != str: 18 raise Exception("Please provide a valid password") ---> 19 obj = Blowfish.new(key) 20 length = str(len(password)) 21 if len(password) <= 9: TypeError: new() takes at least 2 arguments (1 given) Looks like it's missing the mode constant. No revdeps. It uses ECB mode which is a bad idea. Upstream statement: [16:15:16] <mgorny> tampakrap: does edpwd have any real use? [16:15:28] <tampakrap> nope feel free to kill it Let's treeclean it. commit 36379e9501e73930d7ee679ad92250e0b4e172a0 Author: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: Mon Mar 27 16:23:23 2017 Commit: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> CommitDate: Mon Mar 27 16:24:52 2017 package.mask: Last rite dev-python/edpwd commit cc7da255846bbb2196dcd718b2af71a2c1d90a71 Author: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> AuthorDate: Mon May 15 11:14:38 2017 Commit: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> CommitDate: Mon May 15 11:42:12 2017 dev-python/edpwd: Remove last-rited pkg, #611592 |