Summary: | C*FLAGS for individual packages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Marcin Kryczek (RETIRED) <mkay> |
Component: | [OLD] Core system | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Marcin Kryczek (RETIRED)
2004-08-19 07:11:02 UTC
I like that idea. Considering certain packages which dont run too well with, say, -O3 but others go better with that (or something very different). When emerging a world upgrade, I have to take care for every package or all of a sudden everything is fucked up :/ - especially bad for packages which are dependencies of other to update but have/need a different CFLAGS mojo. must you use language like that, Phillip? are you sure with marking it as duplicate of 44796? that bug was generaly about enviromnent variable (well - CFLAGS was mention too, but it wasn't main part) and answer for that bug is surely /etc/portage/ (thus that bug is marked as WONT FIX). here i wanted some new functionality, which can be, but it's not done by files in that directory. bug 44796 isn't enought answer for me... |