Summary: | sys-block/thin-provisioning-tools-0.6.1 : thin-provisioning/restore_emitter.cc:145:11: error: cannot convert ‘persistent_data::btree<1u, thin_provisioning::device_tree_detail::device_details_traits>::maybe_value {aka boost::optional<thin_provisioning::d | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Toralf Förster <toralf> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Robin Johnson <robbat2> |
Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alex.iris.parker, base-system |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 582084 | ||
Attachments: |
config.log
emerge-history.txt environment sys-block:thin-provisioning-tools-0.6.1:20161017-221018.log |
Description
Toralf Förster
2016-10-18 10:09:27 UTC
Created attachment 450634 [details]
config.log
Created attachment 450636 [details]
emerge-history.txt
Created attachment 450638 [details]
environment
Created attachment 450640 [details]
sys-block:thin-provisioning-tools-0.6.1:20161017-221018.log
Related: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30362470/did-boostoptionals-implicit-cast-to-bool-go-away So do we do static_cast<bool>(v) or bool(v); what to people prefer? (In reply to Alex Parker from comment #6) > So do we do static_cast<bool>(v) or bool(v); what to people prefer? Since it's C++, I'd probably use static_cast<bool>(v) with the thought that it would help fend off any objections to using the C-style cast here. Duplicate of bug #596210 (In reply to Alex Parker from comment #8) > Duplicate of bug #596210 Er, I meant bug #593922 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 593922 *** |