Summary: | app-portage/repoman: missing RDEPENDency on git | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Portage Development | Reporter: | . <dev.rindeal+gentoo> |
Component: | Repoman | Assignee: | Portage team <dev-portage> |
Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | tsmksubc |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
.
2016-09-23 19:22:53 UTC
While the vcs's are plugin modules, yeah, it should at least dep on git. I don't think I need to rev bump the existing release for this do I. hmm, I've been looking over the code... How is it you have a git checkout without git installed? Was dev-vcs/git uninstalled/depcleaned after getting the repo checkout? Is there a .git directory at the root of the tree as indicated by it selecting git as the repo vcs? If there are bugs in the repo vcs type detection, I'd like to know that to fix them. (In reply to Brian Dolbec from comment #2) > hmm, I've been looking over the code... > > How is it you have a git checkout without git installed? > > Was dev-vcs/git uninstalled/depcleaned after getting the repo checkout? > > Is there a .git directory at the root of the tree as indicated by it > selecting git as the repo vcs? > > If there are bugs in the repo vcs type detection, I'd like to know that to > fix them. It happened on a docker-based CI server, which apparently checked-out the code and then run an image without git installed. repoman support has been removed per bug 835013. Please file a new bug (or, I suppose, reopen this one) if you feel this check is still applicable to pkgcheck and doesn't already exist. |