| Summary: | app-leechcraft/lc-liznoo: confusing upower handling | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Pacho Ramos <pacho> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Leechcraft Maintainers <leechcraft> |
| Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Remove from tree. commit a45ae1e0e667875770581b71e703434aab2fd358 Author: 0xd34df00d <0xd34df00d@gmail.com> Date: Sun Feb 5 01:33:58 2017 +0100 app-leechcraft: removed ancient versions 0.6.60, 0.6.65 and 0.6.70. |
I read this in the ebuild: if has_version '>=sys-power/upower-0.99'; then ewarn "The new sys-power/upower version you have installed doesn't have hibernate" ewarn "and suspend. If you need hibernate and suspend in ${PN}, and you use" ewarn "systemd, you should downgrade sys-power/upower to 0.9.23 series. All others" ewarn "should switch to sys-power/upower-pm-utils, also to 0.9.23 series." fi But it doesn't have much sense: 1. systemd people will get suspend support "by free" directly from systemd. pm-utils also conflict with systemd, then, running both don't have much sense (it is even discouraged) 2. Per the message it seems that people running openRC should rely on pm-utils and, then, I don't see the reason for allowing them to run plain upower and let them to see the setup is not working as they expected :/ Thanks :)