Summary: | =dev-util/oprofile-0.9.9-r2 stabilization request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Andrew Savchenko <bircoph> |
Component: | Stabilization | Assignee: | Andrew Savchenko <bircoph> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | STABLEREQ |
Priority: | Normal | Flags: | kensington:
sanity-check+
|
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577752 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: |
=dev-util/oprofile-0.9.9-r2
|
Runtime testing required: | No |
Bug Depends on: | 577844, 579092, 583224 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 577492 |
Description
Andrew Savchenko
![]() Why stabilise two versions with the same SLOT? 1.x contains massive features removal (oprofile, qt interface, most Alpha processors and so on¹), Some users need them, so I'd like to keep 0.9.9 in tree as long as possible. ¹ http://oprofile.sourceforge.net/release-notes/oprofile-1.0.0 There are no slots, however, because there is no way to install both without a lot of hacking as well as there is a little need to install both at the same host at the same time. amd64 stable arm stable Stable for HPPA. Stable for PPC64. Stable on alpha. x86 stable sparc stable ppc stable. Closing. |