Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bugzilla DB migration completed. Please report issues to Infra team via email via infra@gentoo.org or IRC

Bug 57258

Summary: dvgrab does not have correct libdv.so.2 link to correct libdv.so.x.x.x file after emerge of kino 0.7.1 ebuild.
Product: Gentoo Linux Reporter: William Fischbacher <willzen89>
Component: New packagesAssignee: media-video herd <media-video>
Status: VERIFIED REMIND    
Severity: normal CC: esigra, gentoo-bugs
Priority: High    
Version: unspecified   
Hardware: x86   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Description William Fischbacher 2004-07-16 00:10:44 UTC
The current dvgrab ebuild requires a "libdv.so.2" link to the current libdv.so.x.x.x.  After you "ACCEPT_KEYWORDS='~x86' emerge -v kino", the dvgrab program stops due to a new dependent version of libdv ebuild being emerged as well.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge dvgrab
2. ACCEPT_KEYWORDS='~x86' emerge -v kino
3. run dvgrab from command prompt.

Actual Results:  
dvgrab: error while loading shared libraries: libdv.so.2: cannot open shared
object file: No such file or directory


Expected Results:  
Capture Started
"":     0.00 MB 0 frames timecode 00:01:47.01 date 2004.07.13 17:32:38
Capture Stopped


Not sure if this is a kino ebuild issue, dvgrab ebuild issue, or a libdv ebuild
issue.
Comment 1 Peter Jensen 2004-07-16 01:55:11 UTC
Yet another duplicate of bug 1991, it would seem.
This is what 'revdep-rebuild' is for.
Oh, and ACCEPT_KEYWORDS on the command line is evil.
Use /etc/portage/package.keywords instead.
Comment 2 Patrick Dawson (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-08-09 23:22:54 UTC
What Peter said. This is unfortunately a limitation of portage, and why the revdep-rebuild tool exists. When in doubt, re-emerge the package that's giving you errors.
If you still have problems after another "emerge dvgrab" and/or revdep-rebuild, please reopen this bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1991 ***
Comment 3 Daniel Webert 2005-05-24 09:44:58 UTC
closing