Summary: | Ebuild quiz has missing doc entry (#15) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Austin English (RETIRED) <wizardedit> |
Component: | Devmanual | Assignee: | Gentoo Devmanual Team <devmanual> |
Status: | UNCONFIRMED --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | gokturk, qa, recruiters |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://projects.gentoo.org/comrel/recruiters/quizzes/ebuild-quiz.txt | ||
See Also: |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465764 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582180 |
||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Austin English (RETIRED)
2016-01-08 18:14:57 UTC
Based on my understanding, at least Q15 is an open-ended question. There isn't an easy answer to it that we can have in devmanual. Q6 can probably be documented. CC'ing recruiters to get their opinion on the matter. @recruiters, should this be left as is, or documented in devmanual? I think both topics are something QA should be interested in documenting. #6 should never be documented, pure logical one. (In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #4) > #6 should never be documented, pure logical one. Maybe a clarification about revbumping, simply removing or use.masking it would be interesting too (In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #5) > (In reply to Mikle Kolyada from comment #4) > > #6 should never be documented, pure logical one. > > Maybe a clarification about revbumping, simply removing or use.masking it > would be interesting too We usually ask all the things during review, if the recruitee read the PMS carefully, he/she never has a problem with the answer. |