Summary: | Please provide mapping for herd gcc-porting@g.o (GLEP67) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Infrastructure | Reporter: | Michał Górny <mgorny> |
Component: | Other | Assignee: | Please assign to toolchain <gcc-porting> |
Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 569468 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 569336 |
Description
Michał Górny
2015-12-23 15:04:19 UTC
gcc-porting is not a herd AFAIK. No packages are maintained by gcc-porting. Well, it is listed as a herd. But since no packages are maintained, we're just going to kill it with fire. (In reply to Michał Górny from comment #2) > Well, it is listed as a herd. But since no packages are maintained, we're > just going to kill it with fire. We use it as the mail alias to track stable packages that build under our current stable gcc but break under an unstable gcc. This seems like a good thing. How will the workflow go in the future? Still open bugs like #536984 but assign them to toolchain@g.o? I'll keep the alias working, it will just not be listed in herds.xml/projects.xml. |