| Summary: | Auditing Kernel/Security Security projects reuse the same e-mail address | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Infrastructure | Reporter: | Michał Górny <mgorny> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | Gentoo Security <security> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 569336 | ||
|
Description
Michał Górny
2015-12-23 13:50:21 UTC
Auditing is a subproject of the security project. It's probably somewhat informative for the guys in the normal security project to watch auditing discussions take place. So, I don't really see a good reason to make a new alias. On the other hand, if you feel it's necessary for various semantic reasons, that's fine too. (In reply to Jason A. Donenfeld from comment #1) > Auditing is a subproject of the security project. It's probably somewhat > informative for the guys in the normal security project to watch auditing > discussions take place. So, I don't really see a good reason to make a new > alias. On the other hand, if you feel it's necessary for various semantic > reasons, that's fine too. Its needed for GLEP67 as email address is used as identifier in the relationship. I've updated the auditing subproject to reflect security-audit@g.o Might be able to use kern-sec@g.o for the kernel sec project, but this alias is currently empty (and the subproject to my knowledge defunct) Kern-sec should be merged with auditing. AFAIK, I'm the kernel security guy currently on call at Gentoo HQ. (In reply to Kristian Fiskerstrand from comment #2) > Might be able to use kern-sec@g.o for the kernel sec project, but this alias > is currently empty (and the subproject to my knowledge defunct) kern-sec@ now sends to security@, made kernel subproject uses kern-sec; /me calls it a day. |