| Summary: | x11-misc/zim-0.65 version bump | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Jonas Stein <jstein> |
| Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Desktop Misc. Team <desktop-misc> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | sping |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
|
Description
Jonas Stein
2015-11-02 21:21:21 UTC
I file a 0-day request, because the maintainer calls it critical due to possible data loss. Thanks again for bumping zim. To my understanding the bug was in 0.63 already. Is that your understanding, too? I'm considering to package.mask (or remove) 0.63 and 0.64 after the bump to 0.65. What do you think? # git show --stat | sed 's,@gentoo.org,@g.o,' commit 9a904eb7af6cb5980684ecb7ec617e47e5a7f0db Author: Sebastian Pipping <sping@g.o> Date: Mon Nov 2 22:41:16 2015 +0100 x11-misc/zim: 0.65 (bug #564728) Package-Manager: portage-2.2.23 x11-misc/zim/Manifest | 1 + x11-misc/zim/zim-0.65.ebuild | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+) |